Thank you very much. Thank you. I would like to begin by addressing
the terrorist attack in Manila. We’re closely monitoring the situation,
and I will continue to give updates [if] anything happens during this
period of time. But it is really very sad as to what’s going on
throughout the world with terror. Our thoughts and our prayers are with
all of those affected.
Before we discuss the
Paris Accord, I’d like to begin with an update on
our tremendous -- absolutely tremendous -- economic progress since
Election Day on November 8th. The economy is starting to come back, and
very, very rapidly. We’ve added $3.3 trillion in stock market value to
our economy, and more than a million private sector jobs.
I have just returned from a trip overseas where we concluded nearly $350
billion of military and economic development for the United States,
creating hundreds of thousands of jobs. It was a very, very successful
trip, believe me. Thank you. Thank you.
In my meetings at the G7, we have taken historic steps to demand fair
and reciprocal trade that gives Americans a level playing field against
other nations. We’re also working very hard for peace in the Middle
East, and perhaps even peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
Our attacks on terrorism are greatly stepped up -- and you see that,
you see it all over -- from the previous Administration, including
getting many other countries to make major contributions to the fight
against terror. Big, big contributions are being made by countries that
weren’t doing so much in the form of contribution.
One by one, we are keeping the promises I made to the American people
during my campaign for President –- whether it’s cutting job-killing
regulations; appointing and confirming a tremendous Supreme Court
justice; putting in place tough new ethics rules; achieving a record
reduction in illegal immigration on our southern border; or bringing
jobs, plants, and factories back into the United States at numbers which
no one until this point thought even possible. And believe me, we’ve
just begun. The fruits of our labor will be seen very shortly even more
so.
On these issues and so many more, we’re following through on our
commitments. And I don’t want anything to get in our way. I am
fighting every day for the great people of this country. Therefore,
in
order to fulfill my solemn duty to protect America and its citizens,
the
United States will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord -- thank
you, thank you -- but begin negotiations to reenter either the
Paris Accord or a really entirely new transaction on terms that are
fair
to the United States, its businesses, its workers, its people, its
taxpayers. So we’re getting out. But we will start to negotiate, and
we will see if we can make a deal that’s fair. And if we can, that’s
great. And if we can’t, that’s fine.
As President, I can put no other consideration before the wellbeing of American citizens. The Paris Climate Accord is simply the latest example of Washington entering into an agreement that disadvantages the United States to the exclusive benefit of other countries, leaving American workers -- who I love -- and taxpayers to absorb the cost in terms of lost jobs, lower wages, shuttered factories, and vastly diminished economic production.
As President, I can put no other consideration before the wellbeing of American citizens. The Paris Climate Accord is simply the latest example of Washington entering into an agreement that disadvantages the United States to the exclusive benefit of other countries, leaving American workers -- who I love -- and taxpayers to absorb the cost in terms of lost jobs, lower wages, shuttered factories, and vastly diminished economic production.
Thus, as of today, the United States will cease all implementation of
the non-binding Paris Accord and the draconian financial and economic
burdens the agreement imposes on our country. This includes ending the
implementation of the nationally determined contribution and, very
importantly, the Green Climate Fund which is costing the United States a
vast fortune.
Compliance with the terms of the Paris Accord and the onerous energy
restrictions it has placed on the United States could cost America as
much as 2.7 million lost jobs by 2025 according to the National Economic
Research Associates. This includes 440,000 fewer manufacturing jobs --
not what we need -- believe me, this is not what we need -- including
automobile jobs, and the further decimation of vital American industries
on which countless communities rely. They rely for so much, and we
would be giving them so little.
According to this same study, by 2040, compliance with the commitments
put into place by the previous Administration would cut production for
the following sectors: paper down 12 percent; cement down 23 percent;
iron and steel down 38 percent; coal -- and I happen to love the coal
miners -- down 86 percent; natural gas down 31 percent. The cost to the
economy at this time would be close to $3 trillion in lost GDP and 6.5
million industrial jobs, while households would have $7,000 less income
and, in many cases, much worse than that.
Not only does this deal subject our citizens to harsh economic
restrictions, it fails to live up to our environmental ideals. As
someone who cares deeply about the environment, which I do, I cannot in
good conscience support a deal that punishes the United States -- which
is what it does -– the world’s leader in environmental protection, while
imposing no meaningful obligations on the world’s leading polluters.
For example, under the agreement, China will be able to increase these
emissions by a staggering number of years -- 13. They can do whatever
they want for 13 years. Not us. India makes its participation
contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in
foreign aid from developed countries. There are many other examples.
But the bottom line is that the Paris Accord is very unfair, at the
highest level, to the United States.
Further, while the current agreement effectively blocks the development
of clean coal in America -- which it does, and the mines are starting to
open up. We’re having a big opening in two weeks. Pennsylvania, Ohio,
West Virginia, so many places. A big opening of a brand-new mine. It’s
unheard of. For many, many years, that hasn’t happened. They asked me
if I’d go. I’m going to try.
China will be allowed to build hundreds of additional coal plants. So
we can’t build the plants, but they can, according to this agreement.
India will be allowed to double its coal production by 2020. Think of
it: India can double their coal production. We’re supposed to get rid
of ours. Even Europe is allowed to continue construction of coal
plants.
In short, the agreement doesn’t eliminate coal jobs, it just transfers
those jobs out of America and the United States, and ships them to
foreign countries.
This agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries
gaining a financial advantage over the United States. The rest of the
world applauded when we signed the Paris Agreement -- they went wild;
they were so happy -- for the simple reason that it put our country, the
United States of America, which we all love, at a very, very big
economic disadvantage. A cynic would say the obvious reason for
economic competitors and their wish to see us remain in the agreement is
so that we continue to suffer this self-inflicted major economic wound.
We would find it very hard to compete with other countries from other
parts of the world.
We have among the most abundant energy reserves on the planet,
sufficient to lift millions of America’s poorest workers out of poverty.
Yet, under this agreement, we are effectively putting these reserves
under lock and key, taking away the great wealth of our nation -- it's
great wealth, it's phenomenal wealth; not so long ago, we had no idea we
had such wealth -- and leaving millions and millions of families trapped
in poverty and joblessness.
The agreement is a massive redistribution of United States wealth to
other countries. At 1 percent growth, renewable sources of energy can
meet some of our domestic demand, but at 3 or 4 percent growth, which I
expect, we need all forms of available American energy, or our country
will be at grave risk of brownouts and blackouts, our
businesses will come to a halt in many cases, and the American family
will suffer the consequences in the form of lost jobs and a very
diminished quality of life.
Even if the Paris Agreement were implemented in full, with total
compliance from all nations, it is estimated it would only produce a
two-tenths of one degree -- think of that; this much -- Celsius
reduction in global temperature by the year 2100. Tiny, tiny amount.
In fact, 14 days of carbon emissions from China alone would wipe out
the gains from America -- and this is an incredible statistic -- would
totally wipe out the gains from America's expected reductions in the
year 2030, after we have had to spend billions and billions of dollars,
lost jobs, closed factories, and suffered much higher energy costs for
our businesses and for our homes.
As the Wall Street Journal wrote this morning: “The reality is that
withdrawing is in America’s economic interest and won’t matter much to
the climate.” The United States, under the Trump Administration, will
continue to be the cleanest and most environmentally friendly country on
Earth. We'll be the cleanest. We're going to have the cleanest air.
We're going to have the cleanest water. We will be environmentally
friendly, but we're not going to put our businesses out of work and
we're not going to lose our jobs. We're going to grow; we're going to
grow rapidly.
And I think you just read -- it just came out minutes ago, the small
business report -- small businesses as of just now are booming, hiring
people. One of the best reports they've seen in many years.
I’m willing to immediately work with Democratic leaders to either
negotiate our way back into Paris, under the terms that are fair to the
United States and its workers, or to negotiate a new deal that protects
our country and its taxpayers.
So if the obstructionists want to get together with me, let’s make them
non-obstructionists. We will all sit down, and we will get back into
the deal. And we’ll make it good, and we won’t be closing up our
factories, and we won’t be losing our jobs. And we’ll sit down with the
Democrats and all of the people that represent either the Paris Accord
or something that we can do that's much better than the Paris Accord.
And I think the people of our country will be thrilled, and I think
then the people of the world will be thrilled. But until we do that,
we're out of the agreement.
I will work to ensure that America remains the world’s leader on
environmental issues, but under a framework that is fair and where the
burdens and responsibilities are equally shared among the many nations
all around the world.
No responsible leader can put the workers -- and the people -- of their
country at this debilitating and tremendous disadvantage. The fact that
the Paris deal hamstrings the United States, while empowering some of
the world’s top polluting countries, should dispel any doubt as to the
real reason why foreign lobbyists wish to keep our magnificent country
tied up and bound down by this agreement: It’s to give their country an
economic edge over the United States. That's not going to happen while
I’m President. I’m sorry.
My job as President is to do everything within my power to give America
a level playing field and to create the economic, regulatory and tax
structures that make America the most prosperous and productive country
on Earth, and with the highest standard of living and the highest
standard of environmental protection.
Our tax bill is moving along in Congress, and I believe it’s doing very
well. I think a lot of people will be very pleasantly surprised. The
Republicans are working very, very hard. We’d love to have support from
the Democrats, but we may have to go it alone. But it’s going very
well.
The Paris Agreement handicaps the United States economy in order to win
praise from the very foreign capitals and global activists that have
long sought to gain wealth at our country’s expense. They don’t put
America first. I do, and I always will.
The same nations asking us to stay in the agreement are the countries
that have collectively cost America trillions of dollars through tough
trade practices and, in many cases, lax contributions to our critical
military alliance. You see what’s happening. It’s pretty obvious to
those that want to keep an open mind.
At what point does America get demeaned? At what point do they start
laughing at us as a country? We want fair treatment for its citizens,
and we want fair treatment for our taxpayers. We don’t want other
leaders and other countries laughing at us anymore. And they won’t be.
They won’t be.
I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris. I
promised I would exit or renegotiate any deal which fails to serve
America’s interests. Many trade deals will soon be under renegotiation.
Very rarely do we have a deal that works for this country, but they’ll
soon be under renegotiation. The process has begun from day one. But
now we’re down to business.
Beyond the severe energy restrictions inflicted by the Paris Accord, it
includes yet another scheme to redistribute wealth out of the United
States through the so-called Green Climate Fund -- nice name -- which
calls for developed countries to send $100 billion to developing
countries all on top of America’s existing and massive foreign aid
payments. So we’re going to be paying billions and billions and
billions of dollars, and we’re already way ahead of anybody else. Many
of the other countries haven’t spent anything, and many of them will
never pay one dime.
The Green Fund would likely obligate the United States to commit
potentially tens of billions of dollars of which the United States has
already handed over $1 billion -- nobody else is even close; most of
them haven’t even paid anything -- including funds raided out of
America’s budget for the war against terrorism. That’s where they came.
Believe me, they didn’t come from me. They came just before I came
into office. Not good. And not good the way they took the money.
In 2015, the United Nation's departing top climate officials reportedly
described the $100 billion per year as “peanuts,” and stated that "the
$100 billion is the tail that wags the dog." In 2015, the Green Climate
Fund’s executive director reportedly stated that estimated funding
needed would increase to $450 billion per year after 2020. And nobody
even knows where the money is going to. Nobody has been able to say,
where is it going to?
Of course, the world’s top polluters have no affirmative obligations
under the Green Fund, which we terminated. America is $20 trillion in
debt. Cash-strapped cities cannot hire enough police officers or fix
vital infrastructure. Millions of our citizens are out of work. And
yet, under the Paris Accord, billions of dollars that ought to be
invested right here in America will be sent to the very countries that
have taken our factories and our jobs away from us. So think of that.
There are serious legal and constitutional issues as well. Foreign
leaders in Europe, Asia, and across the world should not have more to
say with respect to the U.S. economy than our own citizens and their
elected representatives. Thus, our withdrawal from the agreement
represents a reassertion of America’s sovereignty. Our Constitution
is unique among all the nations of the world, and it is my highest
obligation and greatest honor to protect it. And I will.
Staying in the agreement could also pose serious obstacles for the
United States as we begin the process of unlocking the restrictions on
America’s abundant energy reserves, which we have started very strongly.
It would once have been unthinkable that an international agreement
could prevent the United States from conducting its own domestic
economic affairs, but this is the new reality we face if we do not leave
the agreement or if we do not negotiate a far better deal.
The risks grow as historically these agreements only tend to become more
and more ambitious over time. In other words, the Paris framework is a
starting point -- as bad as it is -- not an end point. And exiting the
agreement protects the United States from future intrusions on the
United States' sovereignty and massive future legal liability. Believe
me, we have massive legal liability if we stay in.
As President, I have one obligation, and that obligation is to the
American people. The Paris Accord would undermine our economy,
hamstring our workers, weaken our sovereignty, impose unacceptable legal
risks, and put us at a permanent disadvantage to the other countries of
the world. It is time to exit the Paris Accord and
time to pursue a new deal that protects the environment, our companies,
our citizens, and our country.
It is time to put Youngstown, Ohio, Detroit, Michigan, and Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania -- along with many, many other locations within our great
country -- before Paris, France. It is time to make America great
again.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you very much.
(Source: Americanrhetoric/ Youtube)
0 Comment "Donald J. Trump Paris Climate Accord Address"
Đăng nhận xét